The fact that so many Angelenos live on so little has profound impacts. Many parents work two jobs, leaving them less time to be involved in their children’s lives and education. Many live in substandard housing or have no savings, meaning they are just one setback from bankruptcy or homelessness. Bad schools, substandard healthcare, teenage pregnancies and other factors leave many stuck in a cycle of poverty that persists from one generation to the next.
Creating policies that help lift people out of poverty should be one of government’s top priorities. Nevertheless, the proposal taking shape in City Hall to raise hotel workers’ wages to $15.37 an hour in Los Angeles is not the right way to go about it.
City Council members Mike Bonin, Curren Price and Nury Martinez have called for a hotel worker living wage as a way to “raise all boats” and address income inequality on a local level. However, their proposal unjustifiably singles out one industry, benefiting several thousand hotel employees while ignoring more than 1 million other low-wage workers. It would impose the second-highest minimum wage in the country for, say, a waiter in a Hilton hotel, while leaving a waiter at the restaurant next door — one that doesn’t happen to be part of a hotel — with a guarantee of only $8 an hour (or $9 after July 1). The justification? Los Angeles hotels have low vacancy rates and are profitable.
That’s not sound economic policy. It’s simply a response — and a troubling one — to pressure from the hotel workers and their union, Unite Here. This time around, the hotel workers have waged the most effective lobbying campaign. Next time it might be fast-food workers. Sorry, mall cashiers, you won’t get a raise because the retailers threatened to leave and city leaders don’t want to lose their sales tax revenue.
Frankly, if the city’s minimum wage is going to be raised, it makes sense to raise it for all city workers across the board.